|
Me163 |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Daithi
Platinum (GB) USERID: 1241240 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 06/Jan/2012 Location: Belfast,Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 2623 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Me163Posted: 30/Apr/2012 at 11:25pm |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uooIqTkdfSY&feature=digest_mon
I want one!!!!!!!!!! One question though - why is it done in green and brown when the German camouflage was green and grey? (Schwarzgrun and Grungrau) I did like Scott's comment - that it's barking mad for speed
|
|
|
I don't care what it says on the profile - I'm so NOT GB!
|
|
![]() |
|
Mustang Sally
Platinum (AE) USERID: 52654 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 19/Feb/2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1956 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/May/2012 at 12:56am |
|
who says ALL German camo were green/grey?
|
|
|
A minimal technical knowledge is required for this hobby; please ensure you know the differences between up and down.
|
|
![]() |
|
Daithi
Platinum (GB) USERID: 1241240 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 06/Jan/2012 Location: Belfast,Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 2623 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/May/2012 at 1:15am |
|
That's 'black-green' and 'grey green' RLM colours - but they certainly weren't 'sand and spinach' a la Battle of Britain RAF colours
|
|
|
I don't care what it says on the profile - I'm so NOT GB!
|
|
![]() |
|
Mustang Sally
Platinum (AE) USERID: 52654 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 19/Feb/2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1956 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/May/2012 at 3:24am |
|
black-green RLM70 and grey-green RLM74 wer not used in combination, it was rather RLM70-71 in the early war for bombers or a combination of RLM74-75-76 for fighters.
Since the Me-163 only got active in JG400 late '44, we can best assume that the combination RLM81 (Braun-violet) RLM83 (Dunkelgrun) was used on the Gelbe 13.
|
|
|
A minimal technical knowledge is required for this hobby; please ensure you know the differences between up and down.
|
|
![]() |
|
Daithi
Platinum (GB) USERID: 1241240 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 06/Jan/2012 Location: Belfast,Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 2623 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01/May/2012 at 6:15am |
|
True - but definitely NOT 'sand and spinach'
|
|
|
I don't care what it says on the profile - I'm so NOT GB!
|
|
![]() |
|
Mustang Sally
Platinum (AE) USERID: 52654 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 19/Feb/2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1956 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02/May/2012 at 3:42am |
|
never liked spinach and the other colour is "spinach-the-day-after"
|
|
|
A minimal technical knowledge is required for this hobby; please ensure you know the differences between up and down.
|
|
![]() |
|
coptor
Platinum (MY) USERID: 635220 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 30/Sep/2010 Online Status: Offline Posts: 848 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02/May/2012 at 9:38pm |
|
Should've made it a pusher prop version. Don't quite like the prop at the nose, the real ME163 is rocket propelled.
EDF would make the rear hole too big. Same with turbine. Tractor/puller prop makes it look funny. Pusher prop is most scale looking as it 'disappears' in the air when spun and because of the pusher configuration, no 'cheating' with prop wash over control surfaces. Edited by coptor - 02/May/2012 at 9:38pm |
|
![]() |
|
Mustang Sally
Platinum (AE) USERID: 52654 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 19/Feb/2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1956 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 02/May/2012 at 10:11pm |
|
EDF is hardly possible due to teh lack of an inlet.
The little propellor on the original was used to drive a constant speed generator to provide electrics. Not sure if a pusher would make it more effective and manouverable than the prop up frone, at least it is more "scale" with a propellor up front allthough it appears huge compared with the original. |
|
|
A minimal technical knowledge is required for this hobby; please ensure you know the differences between up and down.
|
|
![]() |
|
Daithi
Platinum (GB) USERID: 1241240 Hobbyking Addict
Joined: 06/Jan/2012 Location: Belfast,Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 2623 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03/May/2012 at 12:52am |
|
With electric motors the prop 'disappears' anyway (ic engines sort of spoil the look with a cylinder head poking out). Any Komet I've seen has the prop up front for aerodynamic reasons - remember it's basically between a delta planform and a flying wing
Also bear in mind that the front end is considerably fatter (allowing larger motors to be fitted) and also you need to keep as much weight forward as you can - having it rear mounted would lead to all sorts of trimming problems Edited by Daithi - 03/May/2012 at 12:54am |
|
|
I don't care what it says on the profile - I'm so NOT GB!
|
|
![]() |
|
kennyglide
Platinum (AU) USERID: 1062054 Newbie
Joined: 15/May/2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15/May/2012 at 8:36pm |
|
Anyone have some inside info on the arrival date of the new HK Komet? Cheers Ken
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |